SEO, AEO & GEO Services That Rank

It depends entirely on scope: a one-time technical audit and an ongoing monthly retainer covering content, technical work and authority building don't cost anywhere near the same, so a generic figure wouldn't honestly apply to either. Rather than quote one, we scope the engagement based on your site's current state and goals, so you have a clear, specific cost picture before any work begins.

Typically 3–6 months for meaningful movement, depending on your site's current state, competition, and how much content and backlink work is involved. SEO is a compounding effort, not a one-time fix, anyone promising overnight results is worth being skeptical of.

Three: a one-time Technical Audit delivered as a prioritized report, an ongoing monthly Retainer for continuous optimization, and Migration & Redesign SEO for protecting rankings during a website rebuild or platform change.

Both. Since we build the site ourselves, technical SEO fundamentals (site speed, structured data, clean URLs, mobile-friendliness) go in from day one rather than being retrofitted later. We also offer SEO as a standalone service for existing sites we didn't build.

A full review of crawlability, indexing, site speed, mobile-friendliness, structured data, meta tags, and internal linking, with a prioritized list of what's actually worth fixing first, not a 100-page report you'll never read.

No, and any agency that guarantees a specific ranking position isn't being straight with you. Google's algorithm isn't something any agency controls. What we do commit to is doing the actual work correctly: technical fundamentals, content, and structured data that give you a real shot.

Yes. AI systems draw on the same underlying trust and quality signals as traditional search: clear structure, factual accuracy, and topical authority. Sites with strong technical and content fundamentals are the ones AI tools tend to cite, so the two aren't in conflict.

SEO (search engine optimization) earns a ranking in the traditional list of links. AEO (answer engine optimization) gets your page quoted in the direct answer itself, including AI Overviews, featured snippets, People Also Ask and voice results. GEO (generative engine optimization) gets your business cited inside long-form answers from ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude and Gemini, where multiple sources are synthesised into one reply. They are layers of the same job rather than replacements for each other, and they share a foundation: a site that can be crawled, content that answers the question directly, and claims that can be verified elsewhere.

By giving the model something worth quoting and making it easy to parse. Published GEO research found that adding quotations from credible sources raised a page's share of the generated answer by roughly 41%, statistics by about 31%, and inline citations by about 28%, while richly marked-up pages are around 13% more likely to be cited. In practice that means answer-first structure, real figures with their sources attached, accurate schema, server-rendered content the crawlers can read without executing JavaScript, and third-party mentions that corroborate what your own site claims.

On current evidence, no, and we won't sell you one as a ranking factor. Ahrefs analysed 137,210 domains in May 2026 and found that while about 28% publish an llms.txt file, 97% of those files received zero requests from any AI bot that month, and Google's John Mueller has described the format as purely speculative for now. It costs almost nothing to add, so we will if you want it, but it is not a substitute for the things that are measurably working: crawlable server-rendered content, structured data, and content AI systems have a reason to quote.

Mostly content and positioning. The widely cited split puts generative engine optimization at roughly 80% strategic work (how clearly your business is positioned, what third parties say about you, whether your expertise is demonstrated anywhere a model can find it) and 20% technical implementation. The technical half still has to be right, because a model cannot cite a page it cannot crawl, but technical work alone will not get you mentioned.

Yes, though not through Google Search Console, which does not break out AI Overview or chatbot citations as their own channel. We track it by testing a defined set of real buyer prompts across the major assistants on a schedule and recording where you appear, where a competitor appears instead, and how that changes over time, alongside referral traffic from AI sources in analytics. It is sampling rather than a complete ranking report, and we are straightforward about that distinction.